Showing posts with label years. Show all posts
Showing posts with label years. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Twenty Years Later, Still Trying To Make AmeriCorps Cool

Quinn Warwick, 26, an accounting student at WSU and an Americorps urban safety project member, removes branches from a fallen tree in the back of an abandoned home on Melbourne St. on Saturday, March 30, 2013 in Detroit. / AP

WASHINGTON — Last month, Jay Leno, the late-night voice of middle America, was in the middle of an interview with President Obama when he came up with a great idea.

“Would it be possible to do a modern WPA, almost like a America Peace Corps where kids get paid a decent wage, you give them food, and they fix up Detroit, they fix up other cities — whatever — they fix bridges?” Leno asked.

Watching the show from home, Zach Maurin, the executive director of the advocacy ServiceNation, and a man who graduated from just such a program more than a decade ago, sighed.

“It’s like, ‘dude, you got something. It’s been around for 20 years. A million people have done it,’” he recalled in a recent interview with BuzzFeed.

It’s been two decades since President Clinton controversially created AmeriCorps, the national service program that provides a small stipend to around 80,000 young people each year in return for a year or so of work for non-profits. The organization helps Americans across the country and the idea seems like an easy sell for Republicans and Democrats alike.

It’s pretty simple and, budget-wise, pretty cheap: the government funds slots for young people who work with existing non-profits across the country, providing young people trying to figure out what to do next in their life with some money and experience, while also providing non-profits like the Red Cross with the warm bodies they desperately need. AmeriCorps corpsmembers helped rebuild New Orleans after Katrina, the northeast after Sandy and places like Joplin, Missouri after the tornado hit there. Corpsmembers work in schools, national parks, day care centers, soup kitchens, cities by the thousands every year.

Yet the program has never really caught on with actual young people on a large scale, says Maurin, and that’s left AmeriCorps both misunderstood — and politically vulnerable. That’s why Maurin’s nonprofit advocacy group is launching an effort to make national service cool.

Relying on a campaign tactic last used successfully by Mothers Against Drunk Driving to make something else seen as uncool — designated drivers — into something commonplace, ServiceNation hopes to make sure that no one asks the question Leno asked Obama ever again, and to once and for all make a year of paid service to the nation commonplace. If it’s successful, AmeriCorps will finally be the central part of society so many say they want it to be.

AmeriCorps has one main problem, Maurin says. People who should be thinking about it (Americans aged 20-28 are ServiceNation’s target group), aren’t. The more they do, the stronger the support for AmeriCorps in Congress and the easier it will be to expand the program. Maurin’s statistics show there are 30% less Google searches for AmeriCorps now than there were 10 years ago. Numbers of applicants have risen, but nowhere near to where they should be.

“Last year there was a record number of applications: 582,000 for 80,000 positions,” he said. “Everyone was excited because that’s a record, but it’s actually a really, really small percentage of millennials. So while that’s exciting, and it’s a great story to tell Congress, it’s actually a really small number, especially given unemployment among young people. So we think that’s a great indicator the awareness is not there.”

Maurin’s got a plan to make that cribbed from an unlikely source, the campaign to raise awareness to make designated drivers popular. Following the lead of MADD years ago, ServiceNation is meeting with writers and producers of hit TV shows to urge them to insert AmeriCorps into their plotlines.

“Shows are already depicting young people and what they want to do,” Maurin said. “Whether they’re going to go to college or trying to find a job or whatever else.”

Maurin specifically mentioned plotlines on Parenthood and Modern Family, where characters around that 20-28 age bracket have been featured in plotlines about people trying to figure out what to do next.

“Working with writers and showrunners, as they’re putting together their scripts, we believe…we can make the case that this is a powerful idea they can include in their scripts both to have an interesting story — because we have to respect the creative process — but at the same time really highlight a powerful idea that this generation will respond to,” he said. “And then they’ll help cultivate what I like to say will be the next greatest generation.”

President Obama has made national service a big priority, announcing a taskforce in July that seeks to expand the number of opportunities for people to serve their country through national programs that put paid corpsmembers on the ground with non-profits after natural disasters, in schools, and helping out with infrastructure projects across the country. It’s not something Obama gets criticized a lot for on the right — though the program was controversial when it was founded, Americorps was fully embraced by President George W. Bush and eventually became a program with bipartisan support.

But growing the program never became a reality. Obama’s campaign promise to expand the program from 80,000 corpsmembers to 250,000 was never realized after Congress failed to fund the move. After Republicans took over the House in 2010, eliminating Americorps became one of their budget goals.

Supporters of AmeriCorps in Congress say that desire to cut the program comes less from a majority view among Republicans that AmeriCorps is bad and more from a mentality that it cutting things is generally a good thing to do.

“It’s a sign of the times. We’ve moved from having a debate about how to balance the budget and fix our fiscal challenges to a debate about whether or not government is necessary,” said Sen. Martin Heinrich, a Democrat from New Mexico and the first AmeriCorps alum to be elected to Congress, said. “And so from that frame, suddenly things that historically have been bipartisan and very non-controversial become opportunities to fight that debate over and over. And I think [Americorps] is just caught up like many other programs.”

Heinrich said AmeriCorps can be saved from the current budget battles if members are made more aware of what it does.

“It’s really hard to visit one of these afterschool programs that wouldn’t exist without AmeriCorps and not see the value of having kids focused on their schoolwork in the hours of 3-6 instead of being latchkey kids. I mean that has an enormous not only social value but economic value,” he said. “The more that they can see that first hand and not just have an ideological or an intellectual debate about it here in Washington, the more that I think it will have broad support.”

AmeriCorps boosters point to numerous examples of national service skeptics in Congress changing their mind after seeing the impact of AmeriCorps in their districts. Therefore, they say, greater exposure for AmeriCorps can only help the program. The program funnels young people to existing non-profits across the country, providing a system that’s friendly to locals but difficult to quantify supporters say: AmeriCorps is all over the place, but sometimes they look like the Red Cross volunteers, or other groups’ volunteers.

AmeriCorps’ new CEO, Wendy Spencer, is seeking to raise exposure for the group by expanding its role across government. Over the next couple months, she’s meeting with every cabinet secretary to find ways AmeriCorps members can serve their agencies, broadening the reach of the program and, she says, saving significant taxpayer money.

“I just challenged my entire leadership here to be broadcasters,” she said. “I told them to broadcast the great work that you’re doing. Because we can engage in national service, we can run great programs, we can have great evaluations of outcomes in an evidence-based way, but if we don’t tell anybody about it it’s like the tree in the forest. Does it make a noise? We have got to tell our citizens and our constituents why it works, how it works, and the outcomes.”

For Maurin, the outcome of the program for him was a career. Around a decade ago, he was a young guy trying to figure out what to do with himself, something “productive” that wasn’t part of school. National service programs offer something other programs for young people like internships do not: money. The small stipend Maurin earned as an AmeriCorps member helped him live, and helped kick off a lifelong passion.

“I found AmeriCorps and it changed my life,” he said.

Maurin has ambitious goals for his awareness program. In a matter of years, he wants to boost interest in AmeriCorps from the current half-million applicants tenfold. Five million young people interested in national service will finally get the idea the momentum it deserves, he says.

“If we’re going to scale this, we need a movement of everyday Americans, alumni, people who are passionate about this pressing their members of Congress,” he said. “But at the same time, we need to get it in front of the American people in a much more powerful way.”


View the original article here

Obama: I Haven't Had A Cigarette In Six Years Because I'm Scared Of My Wife

President Obama got caught on a hot mic today saying he hasn’t smoked in six years because he’s afraid of his wife Michelle. According to CNN, which caught the candid moment, the president was speaking with a United Nations official.

“I hope you’ve quit smoking,” President Obama said. “I haven’t had a cigarette in probably six years. That’s because I’m scared of my wife.”

Michelle Obama gives a different date for when the president quit smoking, saying in 2011 that her husband hadn’t smoked in “almost a year.”


View the original article here

Monday, September 23, 2013

Porsche Design CEO: Brand substantially grew store footprint in eight years - Luxury Daily

By Staff reports

September 19, 2013


lux

Porsche Design CEO: Brand substantially grew store footprint in eight years
The CEO of Porsche Design at the Luxury Retail Summit: Holiday Focus 2013 outlined the brand's expansion from seven Porsche Design stores in 2004 to over 122 by 2012 following the acquisition of 65 percent of shares by the German automaker Porsche.
Click here to read the entire article on Luxury Daily

Lalique exec: Leveraging heritage can rejuvenate brand for younger consumers
A Lalique executive at the Luxury Retail Summit: Holiday Focus 2013 shared the brand?s strategy to attract new, younger consumers through maintaining its relationship with it passionate brand enthusiasts.
Click here to read the entire article on Luxury Daily


Webinar on Sept. 25: Crafting holiday marketing strategy in an omnichannel, multigenerational and highly promotional environment
Please register now for the free hour-long webinar on Wednesday, Sept. 25 at 2 p.m. on how luxury marketers and retailers must craft holiday marketing strategy in an omnichannel, multigenerational and highly promotional environment.
Click here to read the entire article on Luxury Daily


Luxury Daily?s Classic Guide to Luxury Marketing
While the global economy is going through ups and downs ? trouble with the BRICS, marginal recovery in parts of the EU and regained consumer fervor in the United States ? luxury brands and retailers have managed to hold their own and even grow.
Click here to read the entire article on Luxury Daily


Former Bergdorf Goodman CEO: Customer-first approach translates to retail success
A former Bergdorf Goodman executive at the Luxury Retail Summit: Holiday Focus 2013 discussed how the New York-based retailer found its success through its curated collections, knowledgeable sales team and its high standard of customer service.
Click here to read the entire article on Luxury Daily


Fairmont exec: 48pc of high-end consumers travel four times per year
A Fairmont executive at Luxury Retail Summit: Holiday Focus 2013 said that 48 percent of high-end consumers take four trips per year, and 20 percent travel more than four times per year.
Click here to read the entire article on Luxury Daily


McLaren Exec: Shifting brand image from racing to global luxury
A McLaren executive at the Luxury Retail Summit: Holiday Focus 2013 discussed the challenges faced by the brand after its relaunch as an automotive brand in 2011.
Click here to read the entire article on Luxury Daily


Stark Carpet exec: Lesson from the transition from trade-only to retail
A Stark Carpet executive at the Luxury Retail Summit: Holiday Focus 2013 discussed the lessons the company learned while transitioning from trade-only to a retail trade combination.
Click here to read the entire article on Luxury Daily


Forrester exec: Mobile use exceeds luxury brands? expectations
NEW YORK ? A Forrester Research executive at the Luxury Retail Summit: Holiday Focus 2013 said that although luxury brands may be sluggish to innovate in mobile, marketers that test the medium often see consumers using mobile channels two to three times more than expected.
Click here to read the entire article on Luxury Daily


Inviting opinion pieces on luxury marketing
Luxury Daily is inviting opinion pieces on luxury advertising, marketing, media and retail issues that affect marketers as they run multichannel programs for branding as well as customer acquisition, retention and reactivation.
Click here to read the entire article on Luxury Daily

Sign up to receive Mobile Marketer Daily. The premier mobile marketing publication. Free!


View the original article here

Friday, September 20, 2013

VW going turbo-only in 3 to 4 years

2010 Volkswagen GTI engine bay

This really was a matter of when, rather than if. Volkswagen will apparently be the first manufacturer to phase out naturally aspirated engines in favor of turbocharging its full slate. VW is kind of responsible for ushering in this push towards small-displacement, turbocharged engines that's taken the industry by storm. When it dropped its direct-injection, 2.0-liter turbo in the 2005 GTI it demonstrated that strapping an iron lung to an engine can enhance the powertrain as a whole. VW made fuel economy gains, while also giving a linear, non-laggy turbo experience that it has replicated, model-after-model, to this day.

Speaking with The Detroit News, Volkswagen's executive Vice President of Group Quality, Marc Trahan, told the paper that, "We only have one normally aspirated gas engine, and when we go to the next generation vehicle that it's in, it will be replaced. So three, four years maximum."

Really, it's hard to get teary-eyed about either of these engines going away. VW has access to smaller powerplants that could easily match the performance of the 2.5 five-cylinder and the 3.6 V6, while gobbling up less fuel and providing a better driving experience. What we are sad about is that a similar statement about the extinction of NA engines came from the Vice President of Powertrain Engineering at Ford, Joe Bakaj. We'd certainly get teary-eyed over a world without Ford's excellent 5.0-liter V8.


View the original article here

VW going turbo-only in 3 to 4 years

2010 Volkswagen GTI engine bay

This really was a matter of when, rather than if. Volkswagen will apparently be the first manufacturer to phase out naturally aspirated engines in favor of turbocharging its full slate. VW is kind of responsible for ushering in this push towards small-displacement, turbocharged engines that's taken the industry by storm. When it dropped its direct-injection, 2.0-liter turbo in the 2005 GTI it demonstrated that strapping an iron lung to an engine can enhance the powertrain as a whole. VW made fuel economy gains, while also giving a linear, non-laggy turbo experience that it has replicated, model-after-model, to this day.

Speaking with The Detroit News, Volkswagen's executive Vice President of Group Quality, Marc Trahan, told the paper that, "We only have one normally aspirated gas engine, and when we go to the next generation vehicle that it's in, it will be replaced. So three, four years maximum."

Really, it's hard to get teary-eyed about either of these engines going away. VW has access to smaller powerplants that could easily match the performance of the 2.5 five-cylinder and the 3.6 V6, while gobbling up less fuel and providing a better driving experience. What we are sad about is that a similar statement about the extinction of NA engines came from the Vice President of Powertrain Engineering at Ford, Joe Bakaj. We'd certainly get teary-eyed over a world without Ford's excellent 5.0-liter V8.


View the original article here

Friday, September 13, 2013

India speaks 780 languages, 220 lost in last 50 years – survey

No one has ever doubted that India is home to a huge variety of languages. A new study, the People’s Linguistic Survey of India, says that the official number, 122, is far lower than the 780 that it counted and another 100 that its authors suspect exist.

The survey, which was conducted over the past four years by 3,000 volunteers and staff of the Bhasha Research & Publication Centre (“Bhasha” means “language” in Hindi), also concludes that 220 Indian languages have disappeared in the last 50 years, and that another 150 could vanish in the next half century as speakers die and their children fail to learn their ancestral tongues.

The 35,000-page survey is being released in 50 volumes, the first of which appeared on Sept. 5 to commemorate the 125th birth anniversary of Indian philosopher Dr. S. Radhakrishnan, who was also the country’s second president. The last one is scheduled to come out in December 2014.

Ganesh Devy, who supervised the project, said this is the first comprehensive survey of Indian languages that anyone has conducted since Irish linguistic scholar George Grierson noted the existence of 364 languages between 1894 and 1928.

There is a major reason for the disparity in the government’s number of languages versus what the survey found: the government does not count languages that fewer than 10,000 people speak. Devy and his volunteers on the other hand combed the country to find languages such as Chaimal in Tripura, which is today spoken by just four or five people.

One of the most interesting aspects of the project is Devy’s view of language as a marker of the well being of a community. Languages are being born and dying as they evolve – note how Old English is unintelligible today, and how different is Chaucer’s Middle English from ours – and that is a natural process. But bringing attention to Indian languages with small numbers of speakers, Devy said, is a way of bringing attention to the societies that speak them, along with the well being of their people.

Here are edited excerpts from our interview with Devy:

Q: What is the need for such a project?

There has not been a survey of languages in the country for the last 80 years. We do not know how many languages there really are. There is no official statistics disclosed to the people since 1961.

Then there are all over the world serious alarms about disappearance of languages and culture. Considering all these, we thought it will be good to have a survey as a beginning of a much larger project. So now we have now completed the language survey of India. We will soon begin an ethnographic survey.

Q: What is the main finding?

That India has a fascinating diversity of languages unlike anywhere else in the world, with 780 languages reported in our volumes and maybe another 100 or so which we were not able to report. So it is like having about 900 living languages in a country, which is very exciting news.

Q: Who did the work?

They are linguists. Also our people are people who are linked with the language.

Q: In which areas of the country are language clusters mainly found?

In all the states and union territories, invariably, there are at least 10 languages or more, but in urban spaces, like Delhi or Bombay, or Hyderabad or Bangalore, nearly 300 language communities inhabit that space in a very substantial number for each community. In the northeast, there are more than 250 languages.

Q: On the other hand, language decline is more visible along the coast of India.

Because of change in the sea farming technology, local people have lost their livelihood. They are no longer into fishing, making of nets, ship breaking. They have migrated inward. So they have migrated out of their language zones… Wherever people move from one livelihood to another livelihood, they carry their language for a while. But in the second generation, or the third generation, a shift takes place. The third generation no longer feels related to the earlier language the same way.

Q: Where else do you find major decline?

Nomadic communities. We had a very terrible law brought in by the British called the Criminal Tribes Act, 1871 (Rescinded in 1952). Under that act, many communities were described as criminal by birth, not criminal by act. So those communities got stigmatised. … They are mostly nomadic in habit, and today in India those people are trying to move away from their cultural identity. They are trying to conceal their cultural identity. Therefore they are giving up their language.

Q: Which other countries have rich language diversity?

Papua New Guinea. There is a claim that there can be perhaps 1,100 languages in that country.  But the demographic statistics do not bear out that claim.

The next is Indonesia, which had, at least 40 years back, 800 languages.

Then comes Nigeria, which has about 350 languages.

Q: How do you preserve a language?

Languages cannot be preserved by making dictionaries or grammars. Languages live if people who speak the languages continue to live. So we need to look after the well being of the people who use those languages, which means we need a micro-level planning of development where language is taken as one factor.

Q: Are you working with the government on ways to preserve languages on the brink of extinction?

There is a desire from the part of the government to understand what we are doing. There is a willingness on our part to be of help to the government if the government asks for help.

Q: Extinct languages: are they mainly from small communities?

In history, very large languages also go down sometimes. Latin is one example. The (ancient) Greek language is another, Sanskrit is the third one. A language does not have to be small in order to face extinction. That is the nature of language … In India linguistic states are created. If there is a very large language for which there is no state, then slowly that language will stop growing. This has happened.

For example, Bhojpuri is a very, very robustly growing language, but there is no state for Bhojpuri. So after some time the robustness will be lost … So small is not the condition for the death of a language. Several external elements play a role. Often smaller languages move to the centre … slowly grow and occupy centre stage …

So this equation that the government will come, will do something, then language will survive, that has to be taken out of all thinking. It is a cultural phenomenon.

Q: There is a volume on sign language. Can you elaborate?

Because deaf people speak … initially in a non-verbal symbolic system. And so if that symbolic system exists and is in practice, it was necessary for us to take note of it. It is very much a language… Similarly, transgender people have their language, thieves have their languages. We have documented the language of thieves, we are trying to document the language of transgender community.

Q: Can you explain?

The semantic rules work differently (for them). With transgenders, the interpretative ability of the brain is handled differently. They may use the same words as you and I use, but the meaning drawn out of those words by transgenders is different.

Q: What surprised you about your findings?

That India has so many languages came as a surprise for me … When I began in 2010, I had assembled speakers of 320 languages, and I thought maybe one could go up to 500 because (George) Grierson’s estimate was around that. But when I found more and more, it was a stunning discovery.

Q: What’s the outlook for languages?

All over the world there is a concern about the disappearance of languages. Languages are dying in a very big way everywhere in the world. Secondly, wherever the English language has gone in the last 200 years, it has managed to wipe out the local languages… But in India, English did not manage to do that because Indian languages have a historical experience of having to deal with two mega languages in the past – one was Sanskrit, and after that, Persian… So Indians knew how to cope with English. And that is why even today, though so many of us use English as if it is our first language, we still do not pray in English, and we do not sing our songs in English.

Q: Can you name a few rising/thriving languages?

Byari in Karnataka, Bhojpuri in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, Khasi in Meghalaya, Mizo in Mizoram, Kumouni in Uttarakhand, Kutchhi in Gujarat, Mewati in Rajasthan.

Q: What about falling/declining languages?

Every state has about four or five languages that are critically close to extinction: Mehali in Maharashtra, Sidi in Gujarat, Majhi in Sikkim (four people in one valley), Dimasa in Assam.

Q: Do you see English as a threat to other Indian languages?

A: I don’t. When a language imbibes words from outside, it grows. Languages grow by taking words from other languages. Every language is from beginning to the end, a polluted language. The threat will come. Hindi has its roots – there are 126 languages surrounding the Hindi belt… Because they are feeder languages, they feed into Hindi, they are the roots for Hindi.

English is the sky. The sky will not harm the tree, but if you chop the roots, a mighty tree can fall. This happened with Latin, and should not happen with Hindi. Out attitude of neglect towards smaller languages is a threat to larger languages.

Q: How do you revive small/declining languages?

Revival is possible only if the livelihood of those people is protected. I’m emphasizing that the language disappears when the livelihood options of the speech community disappears.

(Disclaimer: This article is website-exclusive and cannot be reproduced in any form without prior permission.)

(You can follow David on Twitter at @davidlms25  )


View the original article here

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Syria's chemical weapons; decades to build, years to destroy

A U.N. chemical weapons expert, wearing a gas mask, holds a plastic bag containing samples from one of the sites of an alleged chemical weapons attack in the Ain Tarma neighbourhood of Damascus August 29, 2013. REUTERS/Mohamed Abdullah

A U.N. chemical weapons expert, wearing a gas mask, holds a plastic bag containing samples from one of the sites of an alleged chemical weapons attack in the Ain Tarma neighbourhood of Damascus August 29, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Mohamed Abdullah

By Anthony Deutsch

AMSTERDAM | Wed Sep 11, 2013 11:19am EDT

AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - If Saddam Hussein's Iraq is anything to go by, destroying Syria's massive chemical weapons arsenal will mean checking dozens of far-flung sites in a war zone while the government employs delaying tactics to hide the banned munitions, an expert involved in past U.N. disarmament missions said.

Bashar al-Assad's chemical weapons network comprises remote underground bunkers where hundreds of tons of nerve agents are stored, scud missiles and artillery shells, possibly armed with cyanide, and factories deep inside hostile territory used to produce mustard or VX gas, experts believe.

"It's big. He has one of the biggest chemical weapons programs in the region and even in the world," said Dieter Rothbacher, a former U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq who trained members of the team that just returned from Syria.

"There are calculations that to secure them up to 75,000 ground troops are needed," he said in a Reuters interview. "It took us three years to destroy that stuff under U.N. supervision in Iraq."

First there needs to be an iron-clad agreement, either by Syria joining the Chemical Weapons Convention, but more likely in the form of a U.N. Security Council agreement, in which Damascus relinquishes control of the weapons.

It could be similar to Iraq, where a U.N. Security Council resolution forcing Iraq to declare and destroy its chemical weapons. Certain militaries are already preparing for that scenario, Rothbacher said.

Russia proposed on Monday that Damascus could avoid U.S. military action to punish it for allegedly using chemical weapons in an attack in Damascus last month by agreeing to put its stockpiles under international control.

The Syrian chemical weapons program, set up in the 1970s, reportedly with assistance from Iran and Russia and supplies of raw chemicals from Western companies, was designed to counter Israel.

Its stockpile is believed by Western intelligence to be spread over dozens of sites and includes research and development centers and multiple production sites, some of them underground.

Along with Egypt and Israel, Syria is one of just seven countries that is not a member of the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention, overseen by the Hague-based Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.

Even if Syria follows through with the Russian plan drafted this week to let inspectors in, history also shows there is no guarantee of smooth sailing.

CAT-AND-MOUSE TACTICS

Syria's civil war, now in its third year, has already cost 100,000 lives, excluding as many as 1,400 believed to have been killed in the gas attack in Damascus on August 21, and security will be a major concern.

"Cruise missiles were coming in when we were stationed in Baghdad and we were flying out every day for the destruction," said Rothbacher, who now co-owns a weapons training consultancy, Hotzone Solutions.

Inspectors would begin by mapping out suspected locations and visiting them, then assemble chemicals and munitions at a purpose-built destruction facility.

"The Iraqis had moved all their munitions. They moved the bulk (chemicals). They spread it out, which made our work much more difficult," Rothbacher said, describing how Saddam's forces tried to undermine their efforts.

U.S. officials believe Syria has been moving its chemical stocks, which will make it harder to account for them.

Assad spent decades building an arsenal to deter the militarily superior Israel, which reportedly has both conventional and non-conventional weapons.

Elements of the Syrian military and intelligence apparatus consider destroying the chemical weapons a huge sacrifice that will compromise Syria's regional strategic position and possibly weaken them domestically.

Some experts believe the chemical weapons destruction cannot go ahead during war and warned that Assad may apply the delaying tactics used by Saddam to throw off inspectors.

"He knows that the inspectors must have the cooperation of the inspected state and he certainly saw in chapter and verse how Saddam Hussein's Iraq repeatedly did everything to hinder the inspectors," said Amy Smithson, an expert in chemical warfare at the Monterey Institute of International Studies.

Another priority will be ensuring the weapons don't fall into the hands of militant groups seeking to further destabilize the region.

"It's a tricky business to keep iron-clad control of multiple chemical sites that are located in urban settings that are themselves engulfed in an urban war," Smithson said.

(Editing by Giles Elgood)


View the original article here