Showing posts with label Senate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Senate. Show all posts

Sunday, October 6, 2013

Report takes hard look at senate immigration legislation and the impact on health care

Main Category: Health Insurance / Medical Insurance
Also Included In: Public Health
Article Date: 12 Aug 2013 - 0:00 PDT Current ratings for:
Report takes hard look at senate immigration legislation and the impact on health care
4 stars1 and a half stars

A landmark immigration bill passed by the Senate would create new pathways to citizenship and provide a much-needed boost to the U.S. economy but would do little to ease immigration-related disparities in health care, according to a new report.

"The Senate bill represents the most significant bipartisan effort to reform immigration in many years," says Leighton Ku, PhD, MPH, the author of the new report and the director of the Center for Health Policy Research at the George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services (SPHHS). "It would modernize the nation's outmoded immigration system and let unauthorized immigrants earn a pathway to citizenship, but when it comes to health care, the bill offers no major changes."

The new report, which was funded in part by the Commonwealth Fund, analyzes the impact of the bill overall and specifically on health care. Ku found that the legislation would help clear the path for new legal immigration and help unauthorized immigrants earn legal status over more than a decade. That in turn, would expand the nation's workforce, bolster the economy and could help reduce the federal deficit, he says. The bill would also limit the future flow of unauthorized immigrants. But the issue brief also says that increasing access to health care for immigrants was not a high priority item in designing the bill, particularly in light of the continuing controversies about health reform.

For example, many not-yet-legal immigrants would be ineligible for most of the reforms under the Affordable Care Act, such as premium assistance or cost sharing subsidies, according to the analysis. Under the Senate bill, these immigrants could gain legal status, but remain ineligible for government assistance in obtaining health insurance or access to health care.

"Experience tells us that legalizing unauthorized immigrants will help them get better jobs in the long run. In turn, this may help them get job-based private health insurance," said Ku, who is also a professor in the Department of Health Policy at SPHHS.

Other key findings of the issue brief:

Because so many immigrants will remain without health insurance, there will continue to be a strain on the U.S. safety net of health care facilities. It will be important to maintain the nation's health care safety net, which includes community health centers and essential hospitals, to care for those who remain uninsured, including both immigrants and the native-born. The Senate bill would also make it easier for physicians and nurses from other countries to gain legal status in the United States - if they agree to provide care in rural or underserved regions. That provision could ease the health care workforce shortages in many parts of the nation. Since immigration reform will result in more people entering the United States, there will be a greater need for language assistance to help the newcomers who have a limited ability to speak English. Although federal policy already calls on health care providers to offer translation services, language barriers continue to be a common problem.

The issue brief notes that the bill still faces a rocky road ahead in terms of passage into law. The bill was developed after months of work by the so-called "Gang of Eight" Senators and passed with a strong bipartisan 68 to 32 vote. But the bill has elicited resistance now that the immigration reform debate has moved to the U.S. House of Representatives, Ku says. Despite the momentum that built up around the passage of this bill, the future of immigration reform remains uncertain, Ku says.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.
Visit our health insurance / medical insurance section for the latest news on this subject.

The issue brief, The Bipartisan Senate Immigration Bill: Implications for Health Coverage and Health Access, can be viewed at the SPHHS Department of Health Policy's website. A blog post on the same subject can be viewed at the Commonwealth Fund website.

George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

George Washington University School of Public Heal. "Report takes hard look at senate immigration legislation and the impact on health care." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 12 Aug. 2013. Web.
6 Oct. 2013. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


'Report takes hard look at senate immigration legislation and the impact on health care'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam). We reserve the right to amend opinions where we deem necessary.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Ted Cruz Reads "Green Eggs And Ham" On The Senate Floor

I know, right? Now tell your friends!if(typeof getUrlVars()['reaction']!='undefined'){videoad.init()}

Thanks for Registering! Before you can vote or contribute we need to quickly validate your email address. We’ve sent you a confirmation email with instructions. If you don’t receive the email in a few minutes, please check your spam folder.

I know, right? Will your friends agree?

Senate Confirms Todd Hughes, First Out Gay Federal Appeals Court Judge, With No Opposition

WASHINGTON — On Tuesday, the Senate confirmed Todd Hughes’ nomination to be a judge on the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals on a 98-0 vote, making him the first out gay federal appellate judge in the nation’s history.

President Obama nominated Hughes to the post on Feb. 7. He was the second out gay man he nominated for the Federal Circuit. The first nominee, Edward DuMont, never had his nomination advanced by the Senate Judiciary Committee and it eventually was withdrawn.

Hughes, a 46-year-old Duke Law School graduate, has worked in the Department of Justice since 1994, currently serving as the deputy director of the Commercial Litigation Branch of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. After graduating from law school in 1992, Hughes clerked for Judge Robert Krupansky of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for two years before starting at the Justice Department.

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals is a specialty court that focuses on the issues that have been a part of Hughes’ practice at the Justice Department. Unlike other federal appeals courts, the federal circuit only considers a limited docket of cases: appeals of patent cases, appeals from the Federal Court of Claims and other specifically delineated areas of appeal. Other federal appeals courts, in contrast, have the cases they hear determined by geography.

After a hearing on June 19, the Senate Judiciary Committee sent Hughes’ nomination to the full Senate on a voice vote on July 18, leading to Tuesday’s historic vote.

“I am proud that today the Senate is finally taking this critical step to break down another barrier and increase diversity on our Federal bench,” Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy said in a statement after Tuesday’s vote.

The Alliance for Justice, which tracks judicial nominations, and the Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund, which supports out LGBT appointees and candidates, celebrated the confirmation.

“Today’s vote to confirm Todd Hughes marks another milestone in the long journey toward justice and equality,” Alliance for Justice President Nan Aron said in a statement. “Alliance for Justice long has fought for a federal judiciary that reflects the full diversity of America and a confirmation process that evaluates candidates based on their legal expertise, not how they look or who they love.”

“All of us at Victory Fund are thrilled with today’s vote. Todd’s confirmation speaks to the growing opportunity for LGBT Americans who want to serve their country, and to the president’s respect for the depth of talent and experience within the LGBT community,” Chuck Wolfe, the president of the Victory Fund, said in a statement provided to BuzzFeed.

Although several other of Obama’s out LGBT judicial nominees have been approved by the Senate, The New York Times reported Tuesday morning that Sen. Marco Rubio had withdrawn his support for a Florida district court judicial nominee, Judge William Thomas, effectively holding up the nomination as one of the two home-state senators. Thomas would be the first out gay black male federal judge.

In addition to Thomas, after Hughes’ confirmation, one other out nominee — Judith Levy, nominated for the Eastern District of Michigan — remains pending. She was nominated on July 25 and rated as “Unanimously Qualified” by the American Bar Association.

Currently serving out LGBT federal lifetime-tenured judges include Judge Deborah Batts, who is on senior status in the Southern District of New York; Judges Paul Oetken and Alison Nathan, both also of the Southern District of New York; Judge Michael Fitzgerald of the Central District of California; Judge Pamela Ki Mai Chen of the Eastern District of New York; Judge Michael McShane of the District of Oregon; and Judge Nitza QuiƱones Alejandro of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.


View the original article here